Hello fellow math, engineering, and computer science/technology students!

So here is my dilemma... I've been accepted to U of T Architecture and Waterloo Urban Planning after being rejected Waterloo Architecture. Originally my plan was to go to university studying architecture but I have heard some negative things about U of T arch. If I were to go to Waterloo Planning I would move towards more of a design based study hopefully to master in architecture.

So here are my questions...

Would I be able to master in architecture after Waterloo planning?
How are the courses at U of T Architecture?
Would Waterloo Urban Planning, even if I am not able to master in architecture, be a better choice for me over U of T arch?

Yeah you do need a master's to become a licensed architect but I am wondering if planning would give enough skill set to be able to submit a portfolio when I am applying for masters because I would be going up against people who have studied 4 years of architecture.
Also U of T architecture is starting next year under the John H. Daneils Architecture, Landscape, and Design, however does this mean anything? Like better programs? More focus?
I know that it is was under humanities previous years and from some people I talked to they even said that there were NO architecture courses first year which I find ridiculous... but now I am looking at first year courses and there is. Maybe because of the change? http://www.daniels.utoronto.ca/courses

I just don't want to make a mistake that will make me repeat first year lol, so any information, specifically from students that have been in the programs before would be greatly appreciated!

Anyone help? :-)