|
|
|
Rank: Student Body President
Joined: 12/22/2010 Posts: 1,330
|
Note my posting of this thread in the "The Real World" subforum, not the "The Ideal World" subforum. A few things I've learned from a) friends who have finished degrees (bachelor's, Master's, and even PhDs) and diplomas (for the most part, technical ones, like welding, engineering technologies), b) my own experience applying for jobs, and c) my interest in providing my oldest nephew (who is in grade 12 now) with good information: 1) websites sponsoring certain careers are much like advertisers of any other sort: they tend to be deceitful. A supposedly "in demand" career is likely not actually in demand. - advice: look on job boards (e.g. Workopolis, Monster, etc... wowjobs.com is my favourite) to see how in-demand a career actually is. 2) university degrees and college diplomas are quite often a waste of time, usually when an advanced degree/certification is not pursued or special skills (e.g. communication skills, self-marketing/networking skills, interviewing skills) are not attained 3) entry-level bachelor's degrees that are usually not a waste of time: nursing, engineering, computer science, geology, business. That's about it. There are a few bachelor's degrees that are second-entry. These are also usually not a waste of time (pharmacy and law are the first that come to mind). 4) (a note to point #3): studying something IN UNIVERSITY simply because you have an interest in it is pretty stupid. If you have an interest in something but don't plan on making a career out of it, then it's better and much cheaper to just learn it on your own. 5) Not uncommon (perhaps because of the poor economy, perhaps not) is that senior positions are in demand but entry-level positions are almost non-existent. Pretty tough to get a career in some field when all positions require experience and you don't have any experience. 6) Careers that are in demand that would be fairly easy to get with little to no experience: nurses/health care aides of all sorts, engineer, truck driver, receptionist, cashier/customer service rep, sales rep/accounts manager, oil field labourers, accountant/financial analyst, pharmacy technicians/assistants and medical laboratory technologists/assistants, and trade technicians of numerous sorts (e.g. plumbers, civil engineering technologists, welders, land surveyors). 7) It is not so much what you know but who you know and, if you don't know anyone, how well you can market yourself. Except in the case of regulated professions, skills >>> knowledge (in the case of regulated professions, skills trump knowledge when you've attained a certain level of knowledge, i.e. have passed professional exams). 8) Employers really don't care how well you did in school. Again, skills are more important. 9) As a corollary to a lot of the above points, co-op/internships/practicums are very worthwhile, especially if you have no interest in doing an advanced degree(s) or becoming a certified professional. I AM speaking generally here. There are exceptions, but these are true most of the time. BMSc Honours Specialization in Medical Science, Minor in Psychology, UWO '09 Bachelor of Pharmacy, University of Alberta '13 - Drop out as of '11 University Certificate in Finance, Athabasca University '12 Petroleum Engineering Technology diploma, NAIT '13
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Student
Joined: 12/29/2010 Posts: 144
|
Very helpful and informative post. I was surprised to find this at the bottom of the page. You probably can't find more straightforward and honest advice elsewhere on these forums.
This stuff is especially important to know because the vast majority of high school kids are fed garbage about university. When you're getting 90's in grade 12, you're led to believe that the world's your oyster and that you can "do any degree you want" in university and have a job waiting for you upon graduation... No. You need some strategy, otherwise you're going to waste a lot of time and money.
I'd like to emphasize point #7... Take time to better your skills. Having completed two years of my degree and currently in the middle of a year off, I'm self-teaching myself a second language that will help land jobs in my field. It took me a little while to fully appreciate how important it is to broaden your skill set beyond your piece-of-paper degree and stand out from the crowd. It's worth the time and energy, folks.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Student Body President
Joined: 12/22/2010 Posts: 1,330
|
That's the problem right there (and the reason why this thread was at the bottom of the page): grade 12 students getting high marks are led to believe that the world is their oysters. Nobody in that deluded state is going to want to hear about reality, but one day they're going to have to face it. Learning a second language is definitely one way of giving yourself an edge. Another is getting certified in microcomputer applications. A lot of job ads list "knowledge of Microsoft Office programs" and "computer savvy" as qualifications. Simply stating that you have these qualifications is not going to give you an edge; being able to show that you're certified in microcomputer applications (or something similar) certainly will. A weird transition is going from blissfully ignorant undergraduate student who thinks he'll have no problem getting a job related to his education to the more realistic bachelor's degree holder who is unemployed and currently is looking for jobs. The former person gives little thought to what is actually employable; the latter person kicks himself for not learning the skills and information that are employable. BMSc Honours Specialization in Medical Science, Minor in Psychology, UWO '09 Bachelor of Pharmacy, University of Alberta '13 - Drop out as of '11 University Certificate in Finance, Athabasca University '12 Petroleum Engineering Technology diploma, NAIT '13
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Student
Joined: 10/25/2011 Posts: 66
|
mynameismattgotmlgo wrote:]8) Employers really don't care how well you did in school. Again, skills are more important.
I AM speaking generally here. There are exceptions, but these are true most of the time. This is sometimes true (but only sometimes). It's a lot easier to get internships than people make it ought to be. Sometimes all it takes is a little bit of creativity to distinguish you from the crowd University of Western Ontario Class of 2015 BMOS with AEO Status
|
|
|
|
Rank: Student Body President
Joined: 12/22/2010 Posts: 1,330
|
I'll let my personal experience and the experiences of my close friends be the judge of that, not the speculation of an undergrad. One thing that has surprised me and my friends from university so much that we've had several conversations about it is just how unimportant marks are to employers. Only rarely is a person asked for his or her transcript. That statement of mine seems to be true MOST of the time, not just some of the time. BMSc Honours Specialization in Medical Science, Minor in Psychology, UWO '09 Bachelor of Pharmacy, University of Alberta '13 - Drop out as of '11 University Certificate in Finance, Athabasca University '12 Petroleum Engineering Technology diploma, NAIT '13
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Student
Joined: 12/29/2010 Posts: 144
|
mynameismattgotmlgo wrote:That's the problem right there (and the reason why this thread was at the bottom of the page): grade 12 students getting high marks are led to believe that the world is their oysters. Nobody in that deluded state is going to want to hear about reality, but one day they're going to have to face it.
Learning a second language is definitely one way of giving yourself an edge. Another is getting certified in microcomputer applications. A lot of job ads list "knowledge of Microsoft Office programs" and "computer savvy" as qualifications. Simply stating that you have these qualifications is not going to give you an edge; being able to show that you're certified in microcomputer applications (or something similar) certainly will.
A weird transition is going from blissfully ignorant undergraduate student who thinks he'll have no problem getting a job related to his education to the more realistic bachelor's degree holder who is unemployed and currently is looking for jobs. The former person gives little thought to what is actually employable; the latter person kicks himself for not learning the skills and information that are employable. Thanks for sharing that info... It's definitely something worth looking into. I knew that computer skills were important, but didn't really know that being officially certified in said area was that beneficial. Did you have to take a course for this certification, or did you complete an online type of training (i.e. like WHMIS)?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Student Body President
Joined: 6/3/2011 Posts: 2,118
|
mynameismattgotmlgo wrote:That's the problem right there (and the reason why this thread was at the bottom of the page): grade 12 students getting high marks are led to believe that the world is their oysters. Nobody in that deluded state is going to want to hear about reality, but one day they're going to have to face it.
Learning a second language is definitely one way of giving yourself an edge. Another is getting certified in microcomputer applications. A lot of job ads list "knowledge of Microsoft Office programs" and "computer savvy" as qualifications. Simply stating that you have these qualifications is not going to give you an edge; being able to show that you're certified in microcomputer applications (or something similar) certainly will.
A weird transition is going from blissfully ignorant undergraduate student who thinks he'll have no problem getting a job related to his education to the more realistic bachelor's degree holder who is unemployed and currently is looking for jobs. The former person gives little thought to what is actually employable; the latter person kicks himself for not learning the skills and information that are employable. I find even the latter person can maintain their delusion for a very long time. I have seen so many of my friends remain unemployed while looking for the "perfect" job, while some just give in and take something crappy. While working at this crappy job they then find the perfect job. It's way easier to find a job when you already have a job, simple as that.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Student Body President
Joined: 12/22/2010 Posts: 1,330
|
Gorges26 wrote:Thanks for sharing that info... It's definitely something worth looking into. I knew that computer skills were important, but didn't really know that being officially certified in said area was that beneficial. Did you have to take a course for this certification, or did you complete an online type of training (i.e. like WHMIS)? I'm considering doing a course like that through Athabasca. Lots of colleges and post-secondary vocational schools of numerous sorts offer courses like that; they're very common. I know Microsoft offers its own certification for its programs ($$$), but having completed a course that teaches all the Microsoft applications should be just as good. See, the thing is, when people make their resumes for a certain position, they usually list as their qualifications all the qualifications that are listed in the job ad (only in their own wording). If a job ad lists as a qualification "proficiency in Microsoft Office applications," then nearly everyone applying for that job is going to say something along the lines of, "I have lots of experience with and knowledge in Microsoft Office applications" in their resume. You don't have any proof of this, and you can't show just how proficient you are (if you are actually very proficient) simply by stating this. If you have successfully completed a course or certification, then you have proof. See what I'm saying? BMSc Honours Specialization in Medical Science, Minor in Psychology, UWO '09 Bachelor of Pharmacy, University of Alberta '13 - Drop out as of '11 University Certificate in Finance, Athabasca University '12 Petroleum Engineering Technology diploma, NAIT '13
|
|
|
|
Rank: Student Body President
Joined: 12/22/2010 Posts: 1,330
|
ktel wrote:I find even the latter person can maintain their delusion for a very long time. I have seen so many of my friends remain unemployed while looking for the "perfect" job, while some just give in and take something crappy. While working at this crappy job they then find the perfect job. It's way easier to find a job when you already have a job, simple as that. This is true. The transition is not just black and white. BMSc Honours Specialization in Medical Science, Minor in Psychology, UWO '09 Bachelor of Pharmacy, University of Alberta '13 - Drop out as of '11 University Certificate in Finance, Athabasca University '12 Petroleum Engineering Technology diploma, NAIT '13
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Student
Joined: 8/24/2011 Posts: 100
|
mynameismattgotmlgo wrote:I'll let my personal experience and the experiences of my close friends be the judge of that, not the speculation of an undergrad. One thing that has surprised me and my friends from university so much that we've had several conversations about it is just how unimportant marks are to employers. Only rarely is a person asked for his or her transcript.
That statement of mine seems to be true MOST of the time, not just some of the time. Clearly, you nor your friends have ever applied for a FO position in finance. Because I've had the exact opposite experience as you describe.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Student
Joined: 12/29/2010 Posts: 144
|
mynameismattgotmlgo wrote:Gorges26 wrote:Thanks for sharing that info... It's definitely something worth looking into. I knew that computer skills were important, but didn't really know that being officially certified in said area was that beneficial. Did you have to take a course for this certification, or did you complete an online type of training (i.e. like WHMIS)? I'm considering doing a course like that through Athabasca. Lots of colleges and post-secondary vocational schools of numerous sorts offer courses like that; they're very common. I know Microsoft offers its own certification for its programs ($$$), but having completed a course that teaches all the Microsoft applications should be just as good. See, the thing is, when people make their resumes for a certain position, they usually list as their qualifications all the qualifications that are listed in the job ad (only in their own wording). If a job ad lists as a qualification "proficiency in Microsoft Office applications," then nearly everyone applying for that job is going to say something along the lines of, "I have lots of experience with and knowledge in Microsoft Office applications" in their resume. You don't have any proof of this, and you can't show just how proficient you are (if you are actually very proficient) simply by stating this. If you have successfully completed a course or certification, then you have proof. See what I'm saying? Yep. You really have to walk the talk in your resume/cover letter. Employers don't like bold statements that you can't back up. i.e. "I'm a team player who's hard working"...
|
|
|
Rank: Student Body President  Joined: 12/20/2010 Posts: 1,572
|
Excellent advice Matt. People brought up how crazy I was to not hire Doctorate and Masters students at McDonald's. I didn't because they did not have the skills necessary to do the job asked of them. Just obtaining a fancy piece of paper is not enough.
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Student  Joined: 4/16/2011 Posts: 240
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Student
Joined: 12/29/2010 Posts: 144
|
ARMY101 wrote:Excellent advice Matt. People brought up how crazy I was to not hire Doctorate and Masters students at McDonald's. I didn't because they did not have the skills necessary to do the job asked of them. Just obtaining a fancy piece of paper is not enough. I just saw this now and lol'd. No you weren't crazy not to hire grad students at McDicks, but "did not have the skills necessary" is just hilarious. You mean you knew better than to hire someone who would be too ambitious to let their soul get sucked away by working at McDonalds for an extended period of time.
|
|
|
Rank: Student Body President  Joined: 12/20/2010 Posts: 1,572
|
Gorges26 wrote:ARMY101 wrote:Excellent advice Matt. People brought up how crazy I was to not hire Doctorate and Masters students at McDonald's. I didn't because they did not have the skills necessary to do the job asked of them. Just obtaining a fancy piece of paper is not enough. I just saw this now and lol'd. No you weren't crazy not to hire grad students at McDicks, but "did not have the skills necessary" is just hilarious. You mean you knew better than to hire someone who would be too ambitious to let their soul get sucked away by working at McDonalds for an extended period of time. No, I meant Grad Students expected a free pass to work for our world-class company just because they were Grad Students. They had no resume experience and just thought having a BA and doing a Grad degree was enough. Well it wasn't. I only hired the best.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Student Body President
Joined: 12/22/2010 Posts: 1,330
|
I can agree with that: "overqualified" people are likely to be less enthusiastic about their job as a burger flipper, are no better at flipping burgers than a high school grad, and probably won't stay long. BMSc Honours Specialization in Medical Science, Minor in Psychology, UWO '09 Bachelor of Pharmacy, University of Alberta '13 - Drop out as of '11 University Certificate in Finance, Athabasca University '12 Petroleum Engineering Technology diploma, NAIT '13
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Student
Joined: 12/29/2010 Posts: 144
|
ARMY101 wrote:Gorges26 wrote:ARMY101 wrote:Excellent advice Matt. People brought up how crazy I was to not hire Doctorate and Masters students at McDonald's. I didn't because they did not have the skills necessary to do the job asked of them. Just obtaining a fancy piece of paper is not enough. I just saw this now and lol'd. No you weren't crazy not to hire grad students at McDicks, but "did not have the skills necessary" is just hilarious. You mean you knew better than to hire someone who would be too ambitious to let their soul get sucked away by working at McDonalds for an extended period of time. No, I meant Grad Students expected a free pass to work for our world-class company just because they were Grad Students. They had no resume experience and just thought having a BA and doing a Grad degree was enough. Well it wasn't. I only hired the best. They had no resume experience? As opposed to the 15 year olds you hired, who went to culinary school and obtained a ton of working experience just so they could come full circle and start making minimum wage again? Ftr I'm not disagreeing with not hiring PhD students; it would be wise not to. But don't make it sound like McDonalds' standards were too high for them to meet when in reality it was the other way around.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Student Body President
Joined: 12/22/2010 Posts: 1,330
|
Bump, because I agree with this thread more than ever now and feel most high school and university students are in need of enlightenment. A university degree absolutely does not guarantee you a job and - hopefully I'm not sounding too bitter - is for the most part a waste of money and time (though there are, obviously, quite a few exceptions). BMSc Honours Specialization in Medical Science, Minor in Psychology, UWO '09 Bachelor of Pharmacy, University of Alberta '13 - Drop out as of '11 University Certificate in Finance, Athabasca University '12 Petroleum Engineering Technology diploma, NAIT '13
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Student
Joined: 12/29/2010 Posts: 144
|
You going down the route of petroleum engineering now, Matt? Just read an article today listing that profession as one of the better ones for the next decade. Lots of money in it.
This thread is helpful because too many people out there think that they have to go down the painstaking routes of med school/other professional schools just to make a living. There are easier and more strategic ways to get good jobs out there. I think part of the problem is that most grade 12's aren't looking past getting into x school, never mind the end of their undergrads and what types of options they will (or won't) have because of their degree.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Student Body President
Joined: 12/22/2010 Posts: 1,330
|
I think a big part of the problem is that people see university as a way to "find themselves" and learn a lot about some topic that interests them - undoubtedly those are true, but I don't think it's worth the four years or more of a person's life and the $60,000+ unless you can get something else out of it. What initially pulled me into oil field work was the money, obviously. I was truly moving one step forward and two steps back, as I had $800/month in loan repayments, was paying $750/month rent and utilities, $250/month in car insurance and gas... that's $1800/month right there and even though I was making $19/hour (pretty decent IMO, relative to what I could have got elsewhere), I was making less money than I owed/spent. What stressed me out more than anything else was that I had no rainy day fund, and I couldn't qualify for any further credit, so if my car broke down and required an $800 fix or something like that, I would have to default on part of my loan repayments. Enjoying life was definitely not in the cards. I don't know how people do it on $12/hour. People just think that having a university degree means they should make more money than tradespeople and hard-working labourers; that may have been true in our parents' generation, but it definitely no longer is. Too many people go to university these days, and there just doesn't need to be that many people with a lot of theoretical knowledge. For every person creating a product, providing an advanced service, or planning a project, there's probably ten people actually carrying out the associated work. It certainly doesn't help that most of us were raised in a soft, highly technological environment: we aren't used to doing hands-on, physical work. I never thought I would be, but since dropping out of pharmacy school I've helped delivery truck drivers make deliveries, got my class one driver's license (Alberta's version of Ontario's class A, which allows you to drive transport trucks), and worked as a labourer setting up the tools that take geological measurements of oil and gas wells. I always thought I'd just be a desk jockey, but those jobs are hard to come by and often don't pay as well. I definitely have a newfound respect for the trades especially. Yeah, I was considering petroleum engineering, petroleum engineering technology, and geology. Seeing as I'm 25, I ruled out pet eng pretty quickly, just because it would take me four years to get the degree (I don't have a lot of transferable credits), and I'd have to spend about that much time as an engineer-in-training before getting P.Eng status. Furthermore, you can't take engineering courses online, at least not from an even half-decent educational institution. Geology would have been just a couple years of school, but it didn't interest me quite as much as petroleum engineering technology, which, with my transferable courses and taking quite a few courses online, will actually only require that I take one semester off of work, which my current employer supports (and actually they are paying for the courses, and they will pay me my base salary when I do go for the semester of classroom schooling). Perhaps surprisingly, the technologists often make more money than the engineers, here in Alberta. Sounds unfair I guess, but technologists usually work in the field, often outdoors in any weather, way up in God know's where, usually for two weeks on/one week off, 12 hour shifts, while the engineers sit in their cozy offices in downtown Calgary, working 9-5 M-F. BMSc Honours Specialization in Medical Science, Minor in Psychology, UWO '09 Bachelor of Pharmacy, University of Alberta '13 - Drop out as of '11 University Certificate in Finance, Athabasca University '12 Petroleum Engineering Technology diploma, NAIT '13
|
|
|