To be on the safe side, I'd say make sure your average is at least in the 90's range. However, I'm sure many people know already, a good supplemental will compensate for a low average.

In my opinion, when I did my supplemental application, I kept in mind about the quality of my extracurricular activities. I would say that I had similar amounts of EC, if not less, but I had a lot to write about for each one of them. The application (if it's still the same for next year) consists of a section to put down what activities you have done and a SHORT (50 word) explanation, as well as several questions that make you discuss your leadership experiences, challenges, etc. From what you told us, it's hard to tell if you will be accepted in my opinion. For example, you can be in the executive team of a club or organization but contribute absolutely nothing, and did you learn anything during this period? The main idea is to identify what the situation was, what actions did you take, and what were your results. I think they want people who can brag about themselves without looking like they are showing off.

lol hi Janet.

Oh come on. Not even going to guess who I am? I'm your best friend from chem :)

-facepalmmm-

Why work for something you know you can't achieve?

Queen's and Ivey are both higher ranked for commerce and produce more respectable MBAs. Sauder would be comparable to something like Rotman which is second-tier next to Queen's/Ivey.

I think this statement is valid but only apply to MBAs, not Commerce Bachelors. However, this doesn't mean Queen's, Ivey, Sauder, Beddie or Rotman doesn't produce good commerce undergraduate students.